lfp coherence analysis (MathWorks Inc)
Structured Review

Lfp Coherence Analysis, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 976 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lfp coherence analysis/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 98 stars, based on 976 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Deep brain stimulation rectifies the noisy cortex and irresponsive subthalamus to improve parkinsonian locomotor activities"
Article Title: Deep brain stimulation rectifies the noisy cortex and irresponsive subthalamus to improve parkinsonian locomotor activities
Journal: NPJ Parkinson's Disease
doi: 10.1038/s41531-022-00343-6
Figure Legend Snippet: The average PSD spectra of 29 and 20 continuous 5-min LFP recordings from 10 control (blue) and 11 parkinsonian (6-OHDA, red) rats, respectively. The open field test (OFT) reveals a significantly higher peak in the α band (7–10 Hz) in control than in parkinsonian rats in both MC ( a ) and STN ( b ). Meanwhile, there is a lower δ band (1–4 Hz) power in both MC and STN in control than in parkinsonian rats, although the differences are statistically insignificant. In contrast, a peak oscillation in β band (20–40 Hz) in parkinsonian but not in control rats is noted only in MC. PSD spectra were presented as mean (solid curves) ± standard deviation (shaded areas). Data in the bar plots were presented as mean ± standard error of mean (S.E.M.). Data were analyzed with Mann–Whitney U tests. ** p < 0.01, N.S., nonsignificant.
Techniques Used: Control, Standard Deviation, MANN-WHITNEY
Figure Legend Snippet: a Prokinetic effects of STN-DBS (depolarizing DC currents of −250 to −300μA) were examined in different parameters ( n = 11 rats). b Sample maps of 30-s trajectories in OFT (boxes) and corresponding LFP recordings in MC and STN in a sample parkinsonian rat with baseline free running (including rest and movement), and type 1 and type 2 movements during DBS (Supplementary Movie to ). c Behavioral parameters in matched 30-s video recordings with type 1 and type 2 movements from the same OFT trial in parkinsonian rats. The “baseline” shows the data from sham stimulation in ( a ). n = 5 matched recordings from 3 rats. d Band power analysis according to the behavioral state during STN-DBS. n = 101, 76, and 14 10-s segments from 9 animals for rest, type 1 movement, and type 2 movement, respectively. e Sample sweeps of MU activities in MC from a parkinsonian rat during movement without (baseline) or with STN-DBS. f , g MC MU spike rates ( f , n = 147 matches, i.e. 21 segments × 7 leads, from 7 animals) and STN bursts during STN-DBS ( g , n = 5 matched segments from 4 leads from 2 animals). h , i Average PSD of S(t) ( h ) and the total power of S(t) ( i ) in MC ( n = 37 at rest and n = 24 during movement in baseline, and n = 26 at rest and n = 34 during movement under STN-DBS, from 7 parkinsonian rats). PSD spectra were presented as mean (solid curves) ± standard deviation (shaded areas). Scale bars represent 1 s/500μV. Data in the bar plot were presented as mean ± S.E.M. Data were analyzed with ANCOVA ( a ), Mann–Whitney U tests ( c ), one-way ANOVA following Games–Howell post hoc tests ( d ), 2 × 2 dependent model ANOVA ( f , g ), and 2 × 2 independent model ANOVA ( i ). In ( f ) and ( g ), each horizontal line reports the simple main effect, and each square bracket reports the main effect of baseline vs. DBS in ANOVA. * P < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, N.S., nonsignificant.
Techniques Used: Standard Deviation, MANN-WHITNEY